In Section 7.4 we derived the impulse response of a recirculating comb filter, of which the one-pole low-pass filter is a special case. In Figure 8.22 we show the result for two low-pass filters and one complex one-pole resonant filter. All are elementary recirculating filters as introduced in section 8.2.3. Each is normalized to have unit maximum gain.
In the case of a low-pass filter, the impulse response gets
longer (and lower) as the pole gets closer to one. Suppose the pole
is at a point
(so that the cutoff frequency is
radians). The normalizing factor is also
. After
points, the output
diminishes by a factor of
![]() |
The situation gets more interesting when we look at a resonant
one-pole filter, that is, one whose pole lies off the real axis. In
part (c) of the figure, the pole
has absolute value
0.9 (as in part (b)), but its argument is set to
radians. We get the same settling time as in part
(b), but the output rings at the resonant frequency (and so at a
period of 10 samples in this example).
A natural question to ask is, how many periods of ringing do we
get before the filter decays to strength
? If
the pole of a resonant has modulus
as
above, we have seen in section 8.2.3 that the bandwidth
(call it
) is about
, and we have seen
here that the settling time is about
. The resonant
frequency (call it
) is the argument of the
pole, and the period in samples is
.
The number of periods that make up the settling time is
thus: